High Yield Fund (HWHAX)


The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher. Investment return and principal value of the fund will fluctuate, and shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when redeemed. Click quarter-end or month-end to obtain the most recent fund performance. The High Yield Fund imposes a 2.00% redemption fee on shares held for 90 days or less. Performance data does not reflect the redemption fee. If it had, return would be reduced.

Manager Commentary
Period ended December 31, 2017



The ICE BofAML US High Yield Index posted a positive return in each calendar quarter of 2017, finishing the year up +7.5%.  The index has posted positive performance in 8 consecutive quarters.  The market’s yield-to-worst at year-end was 5.8%, which is 0.3% lower than it was at the beginning of the year; the market’s spread over treasuries finished the year at 363 basis points, which represents a 59 basis point tightening over the course of the year (the interest rate on similar duration treasuries rose slightly).  The treasury yield curve flattened over the year.  The Federal Open Market Committee increased the Fed Funds target rate by 25 basis points three different times during 2017, moving the rate from 0.75% to 1.50% by year-end.  This precipitated a comparable rise in short-term treasury rates but long-term rates actually fell slightly.  We pay close attention to the yield curve because it has inverted prior to each of the past 7 recessions—while it has flattened, it remains upward sloping.  

Lower rated credits led the market in 2017, with CCC & lower rated credits climbing +10.6% (ICE BofAML CCC & Lower US High Yield Index). BB-rated credits and single-B rated credits increased +7.2% and +6.8%, respectively (ICE BofAML BB US High Yield and ICE BofAML single-B US High Yield Indices).  Spreads for CCC & lower rated credits tightened by 130 basis points compared to just 53 and 41 basis points for BB- and single-B rated credits, respectively.  The best performing sectors were transportation, utilities, and banking; the laggards were retail, consumer goods, and media.  All sectors were positive, and the difference between the best performer (transports) and the worst performer (retail) was about 11 percentage points.  This is in stark contrast to calendar year 2016, when the top-performing sector (energy) outperformed the worst-performing sector (healthcare) by more than 34 percentage points. 

Including distressed exchanges, the par-weighted high yield bond default rate in 2017 was 1.45%.  For perspective, the default rate in 2016 was 4.26%.  The primary reason for the decline in defaults was the energy sector; the sector’s default rate went from 15.6% in 2016 to 2.1% in 2017.  Across the market, revenue, earnings, and cash flow have grown, financial leverage has declined, liquidity has improved, and the maturities are well-termed.  Fortunately, these factors have led to low defaults; unfortunately, these factors have led to tight spreads. 

Despite the tightening of energy credits, we continue to overweight the sector and favor credits with strong asset coverage that are senior in the capital structure.  This has helped us maintain a spread advantage of nearly 50 basis points relative to the broad market.  While the market is tighter than average, fundamentals are solid and we are positioned in credits with strong/quality asset coverage.  We continue to adhere to our core competency of focusing on small/mid cap credits and fallen angels, which we view as a core competitive advantage. 


The Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund (Class I) outperformed the ICE BofAML BB-B US High Yield Constrained Index and the broader ICE BofAML US High Yield Index in 2017.  Positive credit selection drove nearly all of the outperformance for the year.  While credit selection was positive or neutral in 16 of 18 sectors, it was particularly strong in basic industry, energy, and media credits.  The overweight allocation to basic industry and underweight allocation to telecommunications also helped relative performance.  Credit selection in retail and financial services were modest detractors in the year. 

OUTLOOK (Scoring Scale: 1 = Very Negative . . . . 5 = Very Positive)

Fundamentals (4):  The fundamentals score remains unchanged at 4.  Financial leverage (debt/EBITDA) has declined for 5 consecutive quarters.  The default rate, including distressed exchanges, is 1.5% which is well-below historical averages.  Less than 1% of the market is trading at distressed levels.  Market maturities are well-termed out, with little near-term refinancing pressure; less than one-fourth of the market comes due within the next four years.  Perhaps most importantly, revenue, earnings, and cash flows have continued to grow.

Technicals (3):  The technicals score remains at 3.  The primary market remains robust, with $328 billion in new issuance—nearly two-thirds of this was used for refinancing with only 17% earmarked for acquisition/LBO financing.  CCC-rated new issuance comprised 15% of the primary market, slightly below the historical median of 16%.  Market liquidity has continued to improve.

Valuation (2):  The valuation score remains at 2.  The market’s yield-to-worst is 5.8% and spreads over treasuries stand at 363 basis points—a tight market.  Excess spreads, or spreads adjusted for unrecovered defaults, stand at 228 basis points which is only about 60 basis points tighter than the 30-year average.  In other words, strong fundamentals are supporting the above-average valuations.

The ICE BofAML Indices were known as the BofA Merrill Lynch Indices prior to 10/23/17.

Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.  Investments in debt securities typically decrease in value when interest rates rise. This risk is usually greater for longer-term debt securities. Investment by the Fund in lower-rated and non-rated securities presents a greater risk of loss to principal and interest than higher-rated securities. The Fund may invest in derivative securities, which derive their performance from the performance of an underlying asset, index, interest rate or currency exchange rate. Derivatives can be volatile and involve various types and degrees of risks. Depending on the characteristics of the particular derivative, it could become illiquid. Investment in Asset Backed and Mortgage Backed Securities include additional risks that investors should be aware of such as credit risk, prepayment risk, possible illiquidity and default, as well as increased susceptibility to adverse economic developments. The Fund may invest in foreign as well as emerging markets which involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods.

Fund holdings and/or sector allocations are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. Portfolio managers’ opinions and data included in this commentary are as of 12/31/17 and are subject to change without notice.  Any forecasts made cannot be guaranteed.  Information obtained from independent sources is considered reliable, but H&W cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Portfolio’s absolute performance may reflect different results. The Fund may not continue to hold the securities mentioned and the Advisor has no obligation to disclose purchases or sales of these securities. Attribution is an analysis of the portfolio's return relative to a selected benchmark, is calculated using trade information and does not reflect the payment of transaction costs, fees and expenses of the Fund. 

Credit Quality weights by rating were derived from the highest bond rating as determined by S&P, Moody's or Fitch. Bond ratings are grades given to bonds that indicate their credit quality as determined by private independent rating services such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch. These firms evaluate a bond issuer's financial strength, or its ability to pay a bond's principal and interest in a timely fashion. Ratings are expressed as letters ranging from 'AAA', which is the highest grade, to 'D', which is the lowest grade. In limited situations when none of the three rating agencies have issued a formal rating, the Advisor will classify the security as nonrated.

Investing in high yield securities is subject to certain risks, including market, credit, liquidity, issuer, interest-rate, inflation, and derivatives risks.  Lower-rated and non-rated securities involve greater risk than higher-rated securities.  High yield bonds and other asset classes have different risk-return profiles, which should be considered when investing.  All investments contain risk and may lose value.

The average annual total returns for the ICE BofAML US High Yield Index were 0.41%, 7.48%, 6.39%, 5.80%, and 12.32% for 4Q17, one-year, three-year, five-year and Since 3/31/09 periods ended December 31, 2017.

Index definitions

Glossary of financial terms