Large Cap Value Fund (HWLIX)

I SHARES    A SHARES    C SHARES    R SHARES   

The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher. Investment return and principal value of the fund will fluctuate, and shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when redeemed. Click quarter-end or month-end to obtain the most recent fund performance.

Manager Commentary
Period ended March 31, 2019

 

MARKET COMMENTARY

After falling -13.5% in 4Q 2018, the S&P 500 Index returned +13.7% in the first quarter of 2019.  The swift decline and equally rapid recovery were both triggered by changes in investor sentiment as opposed to changes in underlying economic or business fundamentals.  Investor concerns emerged late in 2018 regarding trade tensions and a hawkish Fed; this combination created fears of impending global economic recession.  These concerns appeared to fade during the first quarter of 2019 due to positive progress on US/China trade talks and dovish comments from the Federal Reserve. Throughout this period we have witnessed a significant decline in longer maturity Treasury yields and a flattening of the yield curve.  After reaching 3.2% in late 2018, the 10-year note yield fell below 2.4% in March, its lowest level in more than a year despite the Fed’s four 2018 rate hikes.  In response to these changes, all S&P 500 sectors were positive in the first quarter, with the best returning +20% (technology) and the worst returning +7% (healthcare).  The S&P 500’s forward P/E ratio increased from 15.4x at the end of 2018 to 17.1x at the end of the first quarter.  The index’s median valuation over the past ~30 years is 16.4x; while it is now slightly above median, it is considerably lower than the 20x level where it began 2018. 

While the overall market appears fairly valued, we find solace in the large valuation disparity between certain segments of the market—some are attractively valued, some richly valued.  The S&P Banks Industry Group trades at 9.9x forward earnings.  The median multiple for banks over the last 30 years is 12.0x, so the group currently trades at about 80% of its historical average.  Considering that banks’ balance sheets are as strong as they have been in decades, and nearly 80% of earnings are being returned to shareholders via dividends and share repurchases, we view banks’ risk/reward tradeoff as especially compelling.  The portfolio’s banks trade at an even lower valuation (8.9x consensus earnings and 8.1x normal earnings) with a payout yield of 11% (dividends + share repurchases as a percentage of total equity).  Conversely, the S&P Utilities Industry Group trades at 18.8x forward earnings, or double the valuation of banks.  The median multiple for utilities over the last 30 years is 14.4x, so the group currently trades at about 130% of its historical average.  Opposite of banks, utilities have added financial leverage, increasing net debt to EBITDA by 50% over the past decade from 3.4x to 5.1x.  Utilities can support higher debt levels than most other businesses, but paying high multiples for slow growing businesses with increased leverage is not an attractive proposition in our view.  Recognizing the considerable valuation dispersion across sectors, the portfolio exhibits larger-than-normal sector deviations from the benchmark. 

The Russell 1000 Growth Index outperformed the Russell 1000 Value Index in the quarter by about 4 percentage points (+16% vs. +12%); since the beginning of 2017, growth has outperformed value by 32 percentage points (+49% vs. +17%).  Interestingly, the combination of earnings growth plus dividends paid has been similar for the underlying growth and value companies over this period.  The performance difference, therefore, is almost entirely explained by changes in price multiples.  The P/E ratio for the Value index has contracted by more than 20% while the P/E ratio for the Growth index has expanded by about 8%.  This repricing has contributed to not only the large valuation differences across sectors but also to notable spreads within sectors.  In response to this backdrop our Value approach led to a portfolio that trades at a large discount to the Value index and an exceptional discount to the Growth index.  The portfolio’s price-to-normal earnings ratio is just 58% of the Russell 1000 Value’s P/E compared to the long term average of 71%; the portfolio’s price-to-normal earnings ratio is just 35% of the Russell 1000 Growth’s P/E compared to the long term average of 49%.  As active investors with a commitment to long-term fundamental valuation, we view this environment as conducive to our approach and we are optimistic about the portfolio’s prospects.  

ATTRIBUTION: 1Q 2019

The Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund (Class I) outperformed the Russell 1000 Value Index in the first quarter of 2019.  Positive stock selection drove about 85% of the outperformance in the quarter, with the balance coming from favorable sector allocation.  Positive stock selection in financials and energy were the largest contributors.  The underweight position in healthcare and overweight position in technology were more modest positive contributors.  On the negative side, the overweight in financials and underweight in real estate detracted from performance along with stock selection in consumer discretionary and technology.  The largest positive contributors to relative performance in the quarter were General Electric, Hess, Apache, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Murphy Oil; the largest detractors were Vodafone, Adient, State Street, Wells Fargo, and Embraer.

LARGEST NEW PURCHASES: 1Q 2019

None this quarter.

Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. The Fund may invest in foreign securities which involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods.  The Fund may invest in American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) and Global Depository Receipts (“GDRs”) which may be subject to some of the same risks as direct investment in foreign companies.

Fund holdings and/or sector allocations are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. Certain information presented based on proprietary or third-party estimates are subject to change and cannot be guaranteed. Portfolio managers’ opinions and data included in this commentary are as of 3/31/19 and are subject to change without notice.  Any forecasts made cannot be guaranteed.  Information obtained from independent sources is considered reliable, but H&W cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Specific securities identified are the largest contributors (or detractors) on a relative basis to the Russell 1000 Value Index. Securities’ absolute performance may reflect different results.  The “Largest New Purchases” section includes the three largest new security positions during the year based on the security’s year-end weight adjusted for its relative return contribution; does not include any security received as a result of a corporate action; if fewer than three new security positions during the year, all new security positions are included. The Fund may not continue to hold the securities mentioned and the Advisor has no obligation to disclose purchases or sales of these securities. Attribution is an analysis of the portfolio's return relative to a selected benchmark, is calculated using daily holding information and does not reflect the payment of transaction costs, fees and expenses of the Fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit nor protect against loss in a declining market.

Investing in value stocks presents the risk that value stocks may fall out of favor with investors and underperform other asset types during a given period. Equities, bonds, and other asset classes have different risk profiles, which should be considered when investing. All investments contain risk and may lose value.
 

Index definitions

Glossary of financial terms