Large Cap Value Fund (HWLRX)


The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher. Investment return and principal value of the fund will fluctuate, and shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when redeemed. Click quarter-end or month-end to obtain the most recent fund performance.

Manager Commentary
Period ended September 30, 2018



The S&P 500 Index returned +7.7% in the third quarter and is now up +10.6% since the beginning of the year.  Failed Brexit negotiations and the threat of a global trade war have triggered short-lived bouts of equity market volatility, but positive economic data and strong corporate earnings growth has overwhelmed those concerns.  Despite Wall Street having revised estimates upward rather persistently, 84% of S&P 500 companies beat consensus earnings estimates in the most recent quarter.  The median positive surprise was 6% above consensus estimates.  In technology and healthcare, the two top-performing sectors in the quarter, more than 90% of companies reported an earnings beat. 

Growth outperformed value in the quarter, extending its considerable lead in recent years.  Some of the disparity was due to differences in sector exposures: the growth index has more exposure to technology which outperformed, and less exposure to energy and financials which underperformed.  Sector weights aside, however, stocks with high valuations outperformed stocks with low valuations.  The Russell 1000 Growth Index has outperformed the Russell 1000 Value Index by more than 13 percentage points since the beginning of the year, after outperforming by nearly 17 percentage points in 2017.  As a result, the valuation gap between growth stocks and value stocks has widened.  Three years ago, the forward P/E for the Russell 1000 Growth was 18.6x compared to 15.3x for the Russell 1000 Value, for a difference of 3.3x (“growth premium”).  Excluding the internet bubble, the average growth premium over that last 20 years has been 4.0x, so three years ago spreads were modestly narrower than average.  Today, however, the forward P/E ratio for the Russell 1000 Growth has expanded to 22.9x while the Russell 1000 Value trades at 15.3x, the same multiple as three years ago.  The current growth premium, therefore, is 7.6x (22.9x – 15.3x), or nearly double the long term average.  Earnings growth between the two indices has been comparable, thus the primary cause of the outperformance has been the repricing of growth stocks, i.e. multiple expansion.  We do not believe that this valuation gap can widen indefinitely, and consequently we are optimistic about the prospects of value relative to growth as we look forward.  

We remain overweight technology and energy compared to the Russell 1000 Value, but we have taken capital out of these sectors since the beginning of the year.  The sectors overall, and our portfolio holdings in particular, have outperformed and so we have shifted capital to more compelling valuation opportunities.  We have added capital to financials, industrials, and consumer discretionary for the opposite reason—the sectors overall, and our holdings in particular, have underperformed and now exhibit improved valuations without a commensurate change in risk relative to other areas.  Portfolio changes have been modest in 2018, however, with year-to-date turnover about 22% by weight and 11% by name. 

The portfolio’s valuation discount relative to the market has moved from wide to wider, which gets us excited about the portfolio going forward.  The portfolio trades at 9.8x normal earnings compared to 15.1x for the Russell 1000 Value and 18.3x for the S&P 500 (nearly double the portfolio).  The portfolio’s price-to-book ratio is 1.6x compared to 2.1x and 3.4x for the Russell 1000 Value and the S&P 500, respectively.  


The Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund underperformed the Russell 1000 Value Index in the third quarter of 2018.  Growth outperformed value by a considerable margin, which presents a general headwind for our value-focused approach.  Stock selection in consumer discretionary, healthcare, and industrials detracted from performance.  The underweight position in healthcare, the index’s top-performing sector, was also a detractor.  The overweight position and positive stock selection in technology helped relative performance, along with positive stock selection in the energy sector.  The largest detractors to relative performance were Vodafone, General Motors, Adient, AIG, and Wells Fargo; the largest positive contributors were Corning, Oracle, Discovery, Microsoft, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. The Fund may invest in foreign securities which involve greater volatility and political, economic and currency risks and differences in accounting methods.  The Fund may invest in American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) and Global Depository Receipts (“GDRs”) which may be subject to some of the same risks as direct investment in foreign companies.

Fund holdings and/or sector allocations are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. Certain information presented based on proprietary or third-party estimates are subject to change and cannot be guaranteed.  Portfolio managers’ opinions and data included in this commentary are as of 9/30/18 and are subject to change without notice.  Any forecasts made cannot be guaranteed.  Information obtained from independent sources is considered reliable, but H&W cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Specific securities identified are the largest contributors (or detractors) on a relative basis to the Russell 1000 Value Index. Securities’ absolute performance may reflect different results.  Attribution is an analysis of the portfolio's return relative to a selected benchmark, is calculated using daily holding information and does not reflect the payment of transaction costs, fees and expenses of the Fund. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit nor protect against loss in a declining market.

Investing in value stocks presents the risk that value stocks may fall out of favor with investors and underperform other asset types during a given period. Equities, bonds, and other asset classes have different risk profiles, which should be considered when investing. All investments contain risk and may lose value.

Index definitions

Glossary of financial terms